“The court can impose sanctions and the court can kind of coerce Musk into taking over the company,” she said. “And the courts in Delaware - courts all over - are very concerned about issuing a decision or issuing an order that then is ignored, flouted.”īerger, who was also a vice chancellor of the Chancery Court in the 1980s and 1990s, stood by those concerns in an interview with The Associated Press but said she doubted the Delaware institution would go so far as to make him complete the deal.

“The problem with specific performance, especially with Elon Musk, is that it’s unclear whether the order of the court would be obeyed,” retired Delaware Supreme Court Justice Carolyn Berger told CNBC in July. He’s scheduled to be deposed by Twitter attorneys starting Thursday.īut the consequences of him losing badly - either by an order of “specific performance” that forces him to complete the deal, or by walking away from Twitter but still coughing up a billion dollars or more for breach of contract - has raised concerns about how the Delaware court would enforce its final ruling. Musk hopes to win the case that’s headed for an October trial. The Tesla billionaire’s reputation for dismissing government pronouncements has some worried that he might flout an unfavorable ruling of the Delaware Court of Chancery, known for its handling of high-profile business disputes.

But what if a judge makes that ruling and Musk balks? Twitter wants a Delaware court to order Elon Musk to buy the social media service for $44 billion, as he promised back in April.

Free stock photo supreme court